Legal Opinion

Scott v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided August 14, 2025No. 4:17-cv-00400Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA MALCOLM NIGEL SCOTT, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 4:17-CV-400-GAG-CDL v. CITY OF TULSA, OKLAHOMA, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPÍ, Circuit Judge.1 Before this Court is Defendants City of Tulsa (“Defendant Tulsa”), Gary Meek (“Defendant Meek”), and Randall Solomon's (“Defendant Solomon,” collectively “Defendants”) joint motion to bifurcate the trial scheduled for February 2026. (See generally Dkt. No. 317, the “Motion.”) Defendants, through their Motion, ask this Court to (1) separate the claims…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Easton v. City of BoulderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  2. Patten v. Lederle LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1987
  3. United States v. ProanoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  4. Lewis v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
  5. Taylor v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API