Legal Opinion

United States v. Harris

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided June 7, 1985No. Misc. Dkt. No. 85-04PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREGORY, Senior Judge:

Pursuant to Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 862, and Rule for Court-Martial (R.C.M.) 908(b), the Government has filed an appeal requesting this Court to reverse the ruling of the military judge below which dismissed the charges because Petty Officer Harris had not been brought to trial within the 120-day period specified by R.C.M. 707(a). The Government asserts that the military judge erred as a matter of law in determining that the Government was not legally *796ready to go to trial before expiration of the 120-day period and that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. KuelkerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1985
  2. United States v. CherokU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1984

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. CarlisleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. LonghoferUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  3. United States v. LillyU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1986
  4. United States v. RuhlingU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1988
  5. United States v. ButterbaughU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API