Legal Opinion

United States v. Kuelker

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided May 17, 1985No. Misc. Dkt. No. 85-06PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This case is before us on appeal by the Government. The military judge granted appellee’s motion to dismiss on the ground that appellee had not been brought to trial within the 120-day period specified by R.C.M. 707(a). The Government has asserted that the military judge erred as a matter of law by failing to recognize that the delay in obtaining essential items of evidence in the custody of the United States Treasury Department constituted “delay for good cause,” R.C.M. 707(c)(8), which was required to be excluded in determining the period of accountability governed by R.C.M. 707(a).

In…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. MontgomeryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  2. United States v. BoehmUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
  3. United States v. Michael ArkusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. Gloria Rodriguez-RestrepoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. LillyU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1986
  2. United States v. RuhlingU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1988
  3. United States v. HarrisU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1985
  4. United States v. GivensU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  5. United States v. BerreyU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API