Legal Opinion
Hanna Boys Center v. Miller
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 1, 1988No. 88-1756PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-appellant Hanna Boys Center (“Center”) appeals from the district court’s dismissal of its complaint for want of subject matter jurisdiction. Although the courts are generally prohibited from reviewing NLRB proceedings under section 9 of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 159, the Center claims that the district court should have exercised jurisdiction pursuant to two judge-made exceptions: (1) Leedom v. Kyne, 358 U.S. 184, 79 S.Ct. 180, 3 L.Ed.2d 210 (1958), and (2) Fay v. Douds, 172 F.2d 720 (2d Cir.1949). The Center also…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- National Labor Relations Board v. Catholic BishopSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- White v. MurthaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Fay v. DoudsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- City Of Los Angeles, Harbor Division, A Municipal Corporation, Petitioner-Appellant v. Santa Monica BaykeeperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Schechter v. Illinois, Department of Revenue (In Re Markos Gurnee Partnership)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Vidimos, Incorporated v. Wysong Laser Company, Inc., and Wysong and Miles CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Hanna Boys Center v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Nudo v. McNeilDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.