Legal Opinion

Nudo v. McNeil

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided December 8, 1988No. Civ. No. 87-1428-MAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARSH, District Judge.

This is a securities action brought by an investor against Black & Company, Inc. and one of its stockbrokers. Plaintiff contends that defendants gave improper investment advice amounting to federal securities fraud. Plaintiff also sets forth several state pendent claims.

Defendants move for summary judgment on the basis that the action is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion is denied.

FACTS

Plaintiff first began investing with defendant Black & Co. in August of 1980 by opening a joint account with his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Semegen v. WeidnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,588 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stephen MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. Michael Paul HouserCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Mosesian v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bommersbach v. RuizDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2006
  2. CKH Family Ltd. v. Holt Homes, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API