Employment Division v. Pelchat
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.
The Employment Appeals Board (EAB) held that claimant was not disqualified from unemployment benefits under ORS 657.176. We reverse.
The facts are not disputed. Briefly stated, three weeks after his wife was laid off from her job, claimant left his employment on the East Coast, because he could not earn enough money to maintain his family. He moved to another state first and, ultimately, to Oregon, seeking new employment without success. He applied for unemployment benefits, which Employment Division (division) denied. Claimant appealed, and the hearing officer found that claimant had left…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Pauly v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Kuske v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
3Cited by2 opinions
- Klumb v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Howard v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000