Legal Opinion

Employment Division v. Pelchat

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 21, 1991No. 89-AB-1297-A; CA A67128PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

The Employment Appeals Board (EAB) held that claimant was not disqualified from unemployment benefits under ORS 657.176. We reverse.

The facts are not disputed. Briefly stated, three weeks after his wife was laid off from her job, claimant left his employment on the East Coast, because he could not earn enough money to maintain his family. He moved to another state first and, ultimately, to Oregon, seeking new employment without success. He applied for unemployment benefits, which Employment Division (division) denied. Claimant appealed, and the hearing officer found that claimant had left…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Pauly v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. Kuske v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Klumb v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Howard v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API