Legal Opinion

Klumb v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 22, 1993No. 92-AB-493-A; CA A74838PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) disqualifying him from unemployment compensation benefits because of its finding that he voluntarily left suitable work without good cause. ORS 657.176(2)(c). We reverse and remand for reconsideration.

Claimant worked for employer from July 1 through October 3,1991 as a car salesperson. During the first 90 days of his employment, he earned a guaranteed minimum salary of $1000 per month. During his last month, defendant sold one and one-half cars, well below his sales quota of eight cars. Claimant discussed his performance…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Employment Division v. PelchatCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Howard v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API