Legal Opinion

(PC) Smith v. Miller

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 31, 2020No. 2:15-cv-02534Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES ANTHONY SMITH, No. 2:15-cv-2534-TLN-EFB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 SISKIYOU COUNTY JAIL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. This case proceeds on plaintiff’s first amended complaint against defendant 20 Miller on an Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to medical needs claim. See ECF Nos. 21 16, 35, 40. On March 11, 2020, defendant Miller, the sole defendant in this action, filed a motion…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Forsyth v. Humana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Frank Howey v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. Radio Corporation of America, Third-Party v. Universal Services, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API