Legal Opinion

State v. Kusaj

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 13, 2001No. CR98055633; A105804PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

The state appeals from a pretrial order suppressing evidence. ORS 138.060(3). The trial court concluded that the stopping officer’s observations of defendant’s driving did not support an objectively reasonable suspicion that defendant was driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 813.010, and, therefore, the stop was unlawful. We reverse and remand.

We present the facts consistently with the trial court’s findings. Ball v. Gladden, 250 Or 485, 487, 443 P2d 621 (1968). Officer Evan was traveling behind defendant while driving southbound on Highway 97 in Madras at approximately 4:00…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. BeltOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. State v. SulserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. State v. BriggsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. State v. BRAUKMANCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. LovellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. State v. ShupeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API