Legal Opinion

State v. Lovell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 27, 2010No. 055051; A137229PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, P. J.

Defendant was charged with possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.840(3), after the police found methamphetamine during a consensual search of defendant’s backpack. Defendant moved to suppress evidence of the methamphetamine as well as statements that she made after having consented to the search, arguing that her consent was the product of an illegal stop. The trial court denied the motion after concluding that defendant was not stopped. Following a stipulated facts trial, the court convicted defendant of the charged offense. Defendant appeals, assigning error to the denial of her…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. AshbaughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. TappCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. State v. LeviasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API