Legal Opinion

STATE BD. OF CHIRO. EXAM. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 2007No. C052554PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

55 Cal.Rptr.3d 374 (2007)

148 Cal.App.4th 142

STATE BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS et al., Petitioners,

v.

The SUPERIOR COURT of Sacramento COUNTY, Respondent,

Carole M. Arbuckle, Real Party In Interest.

No. C052554.

Court of Appeal of California, Third District.

February 28, 2007.

As Modified February 28, 2007.

Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Jacob Appelsmith, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Alicia M.B. Fowler, Lyn Harlan and Noreen P. Skelly, Deputy Attorneys General, for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Garcia & Associates, Gaspar Garcia, II, Sacramento, for Real Party in Interest.

MORRISO…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Schifando v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Johnson v. City of Loma LindaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Morgan v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Westlake Community Hospital v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schulz v. Neovi Data Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. 300 DeHaro Street Investors v. Department of Housing & Community DevelopmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Schulz v. Neovi Data Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API