Legal Opinion
300 DeHaro Street Investors v. Department of Housing & Community Development
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 10, 2008No. C053033PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, Acting P. J.
Following the trial court’s sustaining of a demurrer without leave to amend, plaintiff 300 DeHaro Street Investors appeals from a dismissal of its third amended complaint alleging that defendant Department of Housing and Community Development (the Department) breached a contract (Regulatory Agreement) by denying plaintiff’s request to increase rents in an apartment building for which plaintiff received a low-interest loan in exchange for renting units to low-income households under a statutory and regulatory scheme (Health & Saf. Code, § 50660 et seq.; Cal. Code…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- McCall v. PacifiCare of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Perdue v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Agosto v. Board of Trustees of Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Hi-Desert Medical Center v. DouglasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Gas v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Service Employees International Union, Local 99 v. Options—A Child Care & Human Services AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Nathan G. v. Clovis Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.