Legal Opinion
In Re Alden
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided December 11, 1990No. 19-42920PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION ON DEBTORS’ OBJECTION TO CLAIM OF UNION FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK
ARTHUR J. SPECTOR, Bankruptcy Judge.
Union Federal Savings Bank (“Bank”), assignee of Waterfield Financial Corporation, argues that it is entitled to an unsecured claim for attorney fees incurred pre-petition when it commenced mortgage foreclosure proceedings on the Debtors’ home. The issue here is whether the parties’ pre-petition agreement included a right to such fees.
On December 28, 1989, the Bank commenced mortgage foreclosure proceedings against the home of Dennis L. and Kathy L. Alden (“Debtors”). On…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re TudorUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
- Pride Companies, L.P. v. Johnson (In Re Pride Companies, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2002
- Rivera v. Washington Mutual BankDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Kevelighan v. Trott & Trott, P.C.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010