Legal Opinion
Silva v. Daniel O. H.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 21, 1990No. H004308PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CAPACCIOLI, Acting P. J.
Daniel O. H. (Father) appeals from a decision in a juvenile dependency action involving his son, Daniel C. H. (Daniel). Father contends that the trial court denied him due process of law at a hearing combining a six-month review and a supplemental petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 387 because: (1) the court improperly restricted the appointment and testimony of psychiatric experts; and (2) following the hearing, it improperly amended the supplemental petition by adding new issues not properly before the court.1 Father also contends that the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re LifschutzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- In Re Cheryl H.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Michael U. v. Jamie B.California Supreme Court · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Riverside County Department of Public Social Services v. Randall S.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Kern Cty. Dep't of Human Servs. v. Deon C.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Smith v. Ogbuehi, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Department of Social Services v. Ernestine A.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- In re Allen A. CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.