Riverside County Department of Public Social Services v. Randall S.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LUCAS, C. J.
May a juvenile court, when terminating its dependency jurisdiction, issue an order conditioning visitation on a parent’s participation in a counseling program? If so, is the juvenile court bound by the requirements of Family Code section 3190, which governs counseling orders issued by a family court? The Court of Appeal answered these questions “yes” and “no” respectively, thereby creating a conflict with In re Katherine M. (1994) 27 Cal.App.4th 91 [33 Cal.Rptr.2d 298] (Katherine M.). We granted review to resolve the conflict, and affirm.
I. The Distinction Between Juvenile…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Marilyn HCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Cynthia D. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Lisa R.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Sacramento County Welfare Department v. Victor R.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Brunson v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by108 opinions
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. S.M.California Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Nolan W.California Supreme Court · 2009
- Rubenstein v. RubensteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Kevin R. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Bridget A. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.