Legal Opinion

Riverside County Department of Public Social Services v. Randall S.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1996No. S046778PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, C. J.

May a juvenile court, when terminating its dependency jurisdiction, issue an order conditioning visitation on a parent’s participation in a counseling program? If so, is the juvenile court bound by the requirements of Family Code section 3190, which governs counseling orders issued by a family court? The Court of Appeal answered these questions “yes” and “no” respectively, thereby creating a conflict with In re Katherine M. (1994) 27 Cal.App.4th 91 [33 Cal.Rptr.2d 298] (Katherine M.). We granted review to resolve the conflict, and affirm.

I. The Distinction Between Juvenile…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Marilyn HCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Cynthia D. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. In Re Lisa R.California Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Sacramento County Welfare Department v. Victor R.California Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Brunson v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. S.M.California Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re Nolan W.California Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Rubenstein v. RubensteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Kevin R. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Bridget A. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API