Legal Opinion

Michael U. v. Jamie B.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1985No. L.A. 32014PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROUSSARD, J.

This case concerns the custody of Eric, the infant son of Michael U. and Jamie B. Eric has been placed for adoption with Mr. and Mrs. Glenn White. Michael, the natural father, sought temporary custody of Eric, which would enable him to qualify as a “presumed father” under Civil Code section 7004 and thus, by withholding his consent, to prevent the proposed adoption (see Civ. Code, § 7017, subd. (d)). Jamie and the Whites appeal an order granting his request. We granted a hearing to consider whether substantial evidence supported the implied finding of the trial court that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Walling v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. In Re Marriage of CarneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In Re Rose G.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Homestead Supplies, Inc. v. Executive Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. In Re Baby Girl M.California Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Maria P. v. RilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Steven A. v. Rickie M.California Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Fladeboe v. American Isuzu Motors Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. In Re Zacharia D.California Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Shaw v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API