Legal Opinion
United States v. Andrews
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided October 29, 1965No. 18,845PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Quinn, Chief Judge:
As presented by the certificate from The Judge Advocate General of the Navy, the question for our decision is:
“Was the Board of Review correct in holding that the president’s instruction prescribing the maximum forfeitures as a ‘forfeiture of two-thirds pay for six months’ placed a legal limitation upon the sentencing power of the court-martial which precluded the imposition of any forfeiture penalty the total amount of which exceeds two-thirds of one months pay?”
Arraigned before a special court-martial, the accused pleaded guilty to, and was found…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. GordonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
- United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
- United States v. CrawfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
- United States v. GilgallonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
- United States v. RiosUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. JacksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
- United States v. BurkettU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
- United States v. BurkettU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
- United States v. WalkerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980