Legal Opinion

United States v. Andrews

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided October 29, 1965No. 18,845PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

As presented by the certificate from The Judge Advocate General of the Navy, the question for our decision is:

“Was the Board of Review correct in holding that the president’s instruction prescribing the maximum forfeitures as a ‘forfeiture of two-thirds pay for six months’ placed a legal limitation upon the sentencing power of the court-martial which precluded the imposition of any forfeiture penalty the total amount of which exceeds two-thirds of one months pay?”

Arraigned before a special court-martial, the accused pleaded guilty to, and was found…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. GordonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  2. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  3. United States v. CrawfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  4. United States v. GilgallonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  5. United States v. RiosUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. JacksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  2. United States v. BurkettU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
  3. United States v. BurkettU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
  4. United States v. WalkerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API