Legal Opinion

United States v. Burkett

U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided August 30, 2002No. CGCMS 24216; Docket No. 1158PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUM, Chief Judge:

Appellant was tried by a special court-martial, military judge alone. In accordance with his pleas, entered pursuant to a pretrial agreement, he was convicted of eight offenses involving the Schedule II controlled substance OxyContin. The following seven specifications were in violation of Article 112a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 USC § 912a: two specifications of wrongful distribution, two specifications of wrongful use, one specification of wrongful possession and two specifications of wrongful introduction of Oxycontin onto an installation used by,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. LloydCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  2. United States v. BrittonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  3. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  4. United States v. AndrewsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
  5. United States v. WalkerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrisU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008
  2. United States v. JonesUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  3. United States v. NimmonsNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
  4. United States v. RendonU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
  5. United States v. HarrisU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API