Legal Opinion

United States v. Rios

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided November 6, 1964No. 17,838PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

On his plea of guilty, the accused was convicted by a general court-martial at Fort Hood, Texas, of an unauthorized absence in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 886, and was sentenced to reduction to the grade of E-1, to confinement at hard labor for six months, and “to forfeit $50.00 for a like period.” The convening authority reduced the forfeiture part of the sentence to “$15.00 per month for three months.”

Pursuant to Article 69 of the Uniform Code, supra, 10 USC § 869, The Judge Advocate General of the Army referred…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  2. United States v. GilgallonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  3. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. GarmanArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
  2. United States v. HancockU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
  3. United States v. BowenU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
  4. United States v. AndrewsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
  5. United States v. WalkerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API