Mulcrevy, & Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. City & County of San Francisco
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. The facts, which involve the right of a county clerk of San Francisco to retain a portion of the fees received by him for naturalization of aliens as citizens of the United States, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna
Action brought in the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco against plaintiffs in error to recover from them the sum of $2,'972, with interest from certain dates, received by plaintiff in error Mulcrevy in his official capacity as county clerk and ex officio clerk of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco in certain naturalization proceedings. Judgment was rendered on the pleadings against plaintiffs in error. It was affirmed on appeal.
Mulcrevy was elected county clerk • of the City and County of San Francisco at the November election, 1905, for the term…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Norfolk & Suburban Turnpike R. Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
3Cited by24 opinions
- Holland, Jailer v. Fayette CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Burlingame v. Hardin CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Inhabitants of County of Berkshire v. CandeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Schuylkill County v. WiestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- King County v. StringerWashington Supreme Court · 1924
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.