Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n v. Ferrenbach
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri.
1Opinion of the Court
HOOK, Circuit Judge.
This is the second appearance of this cause in this court. When it was first tried in the Circuit Court, a verdict was directed in favor of the association, upon the ground that the policy of insurance had been lawfully declared to be forfeited for the failure of the insured to pay a premium when due, and judgment was rendered accordingly. The judgment was reversed, and it was held that the position of the association was untenable. Ferrenbach v. Life Ass’n, 59 C. C. A. 307, 121 Fed. 945. The facts of the case appear in the opinion reported as above, and we need not again…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. StathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Lovell v. St. Louis Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Guarantee Co. of North America v. Phenix Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Standley v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Alabama Gold Life Insurance v. GarmanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Caminetti v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Gulf Refining Co. v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932
- Federal Life Insurance v. MaxamIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Crotty v. Chicago Great Western Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Federal Life Ins. Co. v. RascoeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.