Legal Opinion
Haff v. Jewelmont Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 5, 1984No. C-83-3104-MHPPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PATEL, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on a motion to dismiss. The issue addressed by the motion is whether plaintiff has standing to sue for alleged violations of § 2(c) of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13(c) (1970), the so-called “brokerage” provision of the Robinson-Patman Act.
I. FACTS
Plaintiff,, Charles E. Haff (“Haff”), is engaged in the business of selling jewelry from wholesale manufacturers to retailers on a commission basis. Prior to August 1, 1981 Haff was employed by defendant Jewelmont Corporation (“Jewelmont”) as a…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Blue Shield of Va. v. McCreadySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Vinod C. Bhan, C.R.N.A. v. Nme Hospitals, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Dba Manteca HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Paul Newman, George R. Hill and Pan Arts Production Corp. v. Universal Pictures and M.C.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- NL Industries, Inc. v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1986
- Gregory Marketing Corporation and Daniel Scher v. Wakefern Food Corporation and Red Cheek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Disenos Artisticos E Industriales, S.A. v. WorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.