Legal Opinion

Paul Newman, George R. Hill and Pan Arts Production Corp. v. Universal Pictures and M.C.A., Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 6, 1987No. 85-6347PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal from a district court judgment dismissing appellants’ antitrust claim. Appellants are Paul Newman, a well-known film actor, George Roy Hill, a prominent film director, and Pan Arts Production corporation, Hill’s closely owned corporation (hereinafter “Newman and Hill”). Between 1972 and 1976, they contracted with appellee Universal Pictures to provide their services in two feature films, “Slapshot” and “The Sting,” in exchange for a percentage of the revenues. They filed this action for damages arising out of Universal’s distribution of revenues from…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Knevelbaard Dairies v. Kraft Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Rebel Oil Company, Inc. v. Atlantic Richfield CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. McGlinchy v. Shell Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. Rebel Oil Co. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Cost Management Services, Inc. v. Washington Natural Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API