Bonner v. Gorman
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF. THE STATE OF ARKANSAS. . The facts are stated in the opinion. There can be no reasonable doubt of the existence of a Federal question in this case. But whether there is a Federal question, or not will be determined by this court for itself upon an examination of the record. Freeland v. Williams, 131U. S. 405; Davidson v. New Bfleans,-98 TI. S. 97. The Supreme.
Read the full summary
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF. THE STATE OF ARKANSAS. . The facts are stated in the opinion. There can be no reasonable doubt of the existence of a Federal question in this case. But whether there is a Federal question, or not will be determined by this court for itself upon an examination of the record. Freeland v. Williams, 131U. S. 405; Davidson v. New Bfleans,-98 TI. S. 97. The Supreme. Court of'Arkansas having denied a constitutional right this court has jurisdiction to review the judgment". Boyd v. Thayer,. 143 U. S. 135. Raising the. Federal, question for the first time in the…
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fuller
In 1893 L. P. Featherstone qualified as administrator of the estate of Mary A. Cole, deceased, in the Probate Court of St. Francis County, Arkansas, with E. Bonner, one of the plaintiffs in error, as one of the sureties on his bond. In 1894, Feather-stone, as administrator, filed his first settlement, and moved from Arkansas to Texas in 1895. Some time after he left the State, Henry P. Gorman, the defendant in error, was appointed by the Probate Court administrator in succession, and on February 1,1898, he filed his first settlement, a second settlement in 1901, and in 1903 his third…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Sayward v. DennySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- California Powder Works v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Mutual Life Insurance v. McGrewSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Union Mutual Life Insurance v. KirchoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Tidal Oil Co. v. FlanaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Ladner v. Siegel (No. 4)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- American Railway Express Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Sunray Oil Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
- Emmons v. SmittCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.