Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Springfield Container Corp. v. Stebbins

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1976No. 75-990PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Relator'argues that the finding'of the Industrial Commission in'favor'of claimant constitutes a gross abuse of discretion and that a- writ of mandamus should issue directing the commission to deny claimant’s appliea*291tion for an additional award. It is relator’s contention that the safety device on the cutting saw used by claimant complies with the specific safety requirements adopted.by the commission ánd, because there is no specific requirement that the guard be adjustable, “failure to adjust is not a proper basis on which to base a finding of a violation of a specific safety requirement.” •

I…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. M. T. D. Products, Inc. v. StebbinsOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Geauga Industries, Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API