Legal Opinion

Riley v. Waller

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion for a new trial, upon the minutes, after verdict directed for the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.

This action is against the executor as such for the value of work done and material furnished by the plaintiff in the actual burial of the 'testator. They were necessary to the burial and suitable in expense to the estate. They were done and furnished at the request !of the widow, but not upon her credit, or upon any contract, but upon the credit of the estate. The evidence of the defendant to show that she never ordered the work and material was excluded as irrelevant, the case being thus rested upon the proposition of law that nevertheless the estate is liable therefor, and the action was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Austin v. . MunroNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Ferrin v. . MyrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  3. Colonial City Traction Co. v. Kingston City RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Hickey v. . TaaffeNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Benedict v. FergusonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of SchulzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1899
  2. Pache v. OppenheimAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API