Legal Opinion
Adams v. Cyprus Amax Mineral Co.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided March 26, 1999No. Civil Action 96-K-71Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KANE, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs, thirty-nine former employees of Amax Research and Development, Inc., bring this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”), against Cyprus Amax Minerals Company and plan administrator, Helen M. Feeney. Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and ERISA 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e)(1). Before me is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, which I grant in part and deny in part.
I. Introduction.
In December 1993, Plaintiffs’ employment with Amax…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Vitkus v. Beatrice Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Blau v. Del Monte Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.