Legal Opinion
Riegel Power Corporation Mount Vernon Mills, Inc. v. Voith Hydro Crowder Construction Company
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided November 6, 1989No. 88-1316PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONALD RUSSELL, Circuit Judge;
This is an action by a buyer-plaintiff to recover of a seller-defendant damages for breach of a warranty of merchantability and freedom of defects in connection with the sale of an electric turbine. The buyer-plaintiff originally was Riegel Textile Company, but Riegel Power Corporation and Mount Vernon Mills, Inc. are the successors in “interest or assignees of Riegel Textile rights under the contract” and sue as such. The plaintiffs are collectively referred to by the parties and the district court as “Riegel”; we do likewise. The defendant Voith Hydro is the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- S. M. Wilson & Company v. Smith International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- American Electric Power Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Beal v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1973
- Aes Technology Systems, Inc. v. Coherent RadiationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- J. A. Jones Construction Co. v. City of DoverSuperior Court of Delaware · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Rheem Manufacturing Co. v. Phelps Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Myrtle Beach Pipeline Corp. v. Emerson Electric Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1993
- Caudill Seed and Warehouse Co., Inc. v. Prophet 21, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Intrastate Piping & Controls, Inc. v. Robert-James Sales, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Colonial Life Insurance Co. of America v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.