In re Pitney
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by Charles Stockton Halsted from portions of an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 5th day of January, 1906, overruling exceptions to the report of a referee settling the accounts of the trustees under the will of Catharine Crane Halsted, deceased, and appointing a substituted trustee.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, J.:
The principal grievance of the' appellant is that, the referee' • refused to. construe the will so as to determine, what should become of the trust estate after the termination of the life beneficiary but the question as to who will be entitled to this estate upon, the' .termination of the interest of the life beneficiary can be properly, determined only . when the time arrives at which the estáte is to be disposed of. Upon this accounting there is no question that requires any construction of the will Or a determination as to who-would be entitled to the estate upon the…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Spencer v. . SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- In re the Estate of PelcygerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- In re the Estate of MenzieNew York Surrogate's Court · 1907
- Broeker v. WareCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1942
- In re the Estate of ChapalNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.