Suter v. Page
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiffs from an order of the district court for Anoka county, Smith, J., denying a motion for a new trial as to defendants Page.
1Opinion of the Court
START, O. J.
This action was originally commenced in the district court of Ramsey county, and on April 27, 1895, judgment was entered by default against the defendant copartnership and the individual defendants, Edward S. Page, Charles H. Page, and Joseph B. Foltz. On August 22, 1895, on motion of the two defendants Edward S. and Charles H. Page, the judgment as to them was opened, and they were permitted to answer, and the place of trial was changed from Ramsey to Anoka county, the place of their residence, where it was tried, resulting in a verdict for them. None of the other defendants ever…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bowers v. SchulerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
3Cited by18 opinions
- Langford v. IssenhuthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- Bernick v. McClureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Allen v. EnerothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Shrives v. TalbotIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- Emery v. Midwest Motor Express Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.