Legal Opinion

Heckman v. Sutter

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 7, 1904No. 792PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

The case, as well as the acts of Congress bearing upon the question involved, will be found stated in the opinion of this court delivered on the former hearing. 119 F. 83, 55 C.C.A. 635. We there said: “When, in 1884, Congress undertook to provide a civil government for Alaska, it made of the territory a land district; located a United States land office at Sitka; put in full force and effect therein ‘the laws of the United States relating to mineral claims and the rights incident thereto/ with certain conditions nbt necessary to be mentioned, withholding therefrom the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. McCready v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Malony v. AdsitSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Pacific Steam Whaling Co. v. Alaska Packers' Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Heckman v. SutterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hynes, Regional Director, Fish & Wildlife Service v. Grimes Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Columbia Canning Co. v. HamptonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
  3. Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  4. Fisher v. EverettDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1945
  5. Hynes v. Grimes Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API