Legal Opinion

Columbia Canning Co. v. Hampton

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 7, 1908No. 1,422PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Circuit Judge.

The complainant alleges that on the 19th day of April, 1905, plaintiff entered upon and staked out and surveyed a piece or parcel of land on St. Mary’s Peninsula, on the north shore of Lynn Canal, in'Alaska. The land described in the complaint has for its southern boundary the meander line of the shore of Lynn Canal at high-water mark. The three other boundary lines, on the north, east, and south, are each 20 chains in length. It is alleged that at the time plaintiff entered upon said land the same was government land, unoccupied, unappropriated, and open to entry,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Mann v. Tacoma Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Pacific Steam Whaling Co. v. Alaska Packers' Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Arnold v. MundySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1821

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Dalton v. HazeletCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
  2. State, Department of Natural Resources v. Alaska Riverways, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes v. NamenDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1974
  4. Fisher v. EverettDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1945
  5. Berger v. OhlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API