Legal Opinion

Albuquerque Lumber Co. v. Bureau of Revenue

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1937No. 4331PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BICKLEY, Justice.

Plaintiff (appellee) conducted a department of its business known as the heating and supply department, and from such department made sales of supplies, including bathtubs, closet combinations, kitchen sinks, laundry tubs and accessories, water pipes, valves, fittings, soil pipes, boilers, radiators, hot water heaters, and accessories thereof. It is alleged that the said articles were sold only to plumbing and heating .contractors, also known as master plumbers,_ who purchased such supplies from plaintiff exclusively for the purpose of placing and installing said merchandise…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Western Leather & Finding Co. v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State v. J. Watts Kearny SonsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  3. MOORE v. American Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1861
  4. Rittenhouse & Embree Co. v. F. E. Brown & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Lone Star Cement Corporation v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Duhame v. State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Crane Co. v. Arizona State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Wood v. Central Sand & Gravel Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1940
  4. State, Department of Revenue v. Debenham Electric Supply Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Utah Concrete Products Corp. v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API