Legal Opinion

Utah Concrete Products Corp. v. State Tax Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1942No. 6398PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Justice.

Review of a decision of the State Tax Commission holding plaintiffs liable for additional sums levied under the Emergency Revenue Act (Sales Tax Act) and the Use Tax Act.

Plaintiff, the Utah Concrete Products Corporation, and the plaintiff, the Utah Concrete Pipe Company, a copartnership, were, during the years 1937, 1938, and 1939, engaged in the manufacture of concrete pipe, cinder blocks and related concrete products. They were primarily engaged in selling these products to public highway and building contractors; a relatively small amount being sold directly for private use.

I…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Alabama v. King & BoozerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Curry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Bradley Supply Co. v. AmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1934

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Duhame v. State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Crane Co. v. Arizona State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Olson Construction Company v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Craftsman Painters & Decorators, Inc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API