Legal Opinion

Dorsey v. Sibert

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1890PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Motion to Dismiss Appeal. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Etowah. Heard before the Hon. S. K. McSpauden. Motion to dismiss appeal, on facts stated in opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, C. J.

— Daniel Callahan filed his bill in the Chancery Court of Etowah county, against the Rome & Decatur-Railroad Company, and Grovestein & Pell, as defendants. The American Loan and Trust Company was subsequently made a party by amendment. It was alleged that the Railroad Company and Grovestein & Pell were insolvent; and on petition filed, Dorsey was appointed receiver to take possession of and preserve the property. Under a decree rendered in said cause, the property was sold, and a title made, and the proceeds of the sale, in part, were placed in the hands of the receiver, Dorsey. At this…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carter v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. City of Mobile v. Gulf Development Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  3. Thornton v. Highland Avenue & Belt RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  4. Andrew v. Sac County State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  5. Cobbs v. Vizard Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API