Legal Opinion

Skyland Hosiery Co. v. American Railway Express Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 5, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

TJpon tbe former appeal the Court awarded a new trial for error committed in placing the burden of proof on the defendant. For a statement of facts, reference is made to the case as reported in 184 N. C., 478. The defendant was afterwards permitted to amend its answer by alleging that under the contract of shipment the defendant was not to be liable for loss unless a written claim therefor was presented by the plaintiff within 90 days, and unless suit for recovery was commenced within one year after such loss, and that the plaintiff had not complied with either of these provisions. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Skyland Hosiery Co. v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Beard v. Sovereign Lodge of Woodmen of the WorldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Watt v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. In Re Will of EdensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. Ray v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Newbern v. . HintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Barbee v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. State v. . CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. State v. CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Smith Ex Rel. Newton v. MyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API