Legal Opinion

Watt v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 11, 1913No. 18,178PublishedCited by 11 opinions

. Appeal from Bourbon district court; John C. Cannon, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Benson, J.:

In a former appeal in this case a judgment for the plaintiff was reversed because of an erroneous ruling that the shipment of horses in question *467was not made under a written contract. The evidence upon the question whether it was so made being conflicting a question of fact was presented for the jury. (Watt v. Railway Co., 82 Kan. 458, 108 Pac. 811.)

At the second trial it was admitted that the shipment was made under a written contract pleaded in the answer. The controlling question upon this appeal is whether a recovery can be sustained…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Watt v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Farmers Grain & Supply Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  2. Kirby v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Enright v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  4. Ray v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  5. Skyland Hosiery Co. v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API