Legal Opinion

Newbern v. . Hinton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 16, 1925PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYaRseb, J.

We are precluded from passing upon tbe merits of defendant’s objections to tbe evidence, since tbe record does not disclose what tbe witnesses would have said if tbe questions bad been allowed. Tbe burden is on tbe appellant to show error, and, therefore, tbe record must show tbe competency and materiality of tbe proposed evidence. This Court will not do tbe vain thing to send a case back for a new trial when it does not appear what tbe excluded evidence is, or even that tbe witnesses would respond to tbe questions in any way material to tbe issues. This is tbe established practice in this…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. In Re HintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  2. In Re Will of SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. State v. . McNairSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  4. State v. . AshburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. Hartford & Salisbury Ore Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rawls v. . LuptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. State v. PoolosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Whitehurst v. AbbottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. State v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. State v. . WallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API