Legal Opinion

People v. Wandel

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 19, 1985No. 84CA0040PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIERCE, Judge.

Defendant, Gary Wandel, was convicted by a jury of second-degree burglary. In the second portion of the bifurcated trial, the same jury found defendant had been convicted of two prior felonies and he was adjudicated an habitual offender. Defendant has appealed from the judgments of conviction and sentence. We affirm.

I

Wandel first contends that the officers were not justified in detaining him or performing the “pat down” search. We disagree.

An investigatory stop and a limited search are justified on less than probable cause if there is an articulable and specific basis in fact…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. People v. GutierrezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. People v. MattasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  4. People v. TateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  5. People v. GonzalesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. KraemerColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. People v. AustinColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. MaassColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. People v. KraemerColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Richardson v. WillamsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API