People v. Tate
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Justice.
The People in this interlocutory appeal challenge the ruling of the district court suppressing a screwdriver seized by a police officer from the defendant, John A. Tate, and a statement made by him to the officer shortly after the seizure. The district court concluded that there was no probable cause to believe that the defendant committed a crime and, therefore, the defendant’s arrest was unlawful and any evidence resulting therefrom must be suppressed. We reverse the suppression ruling because, in our view, the court did not apply the appropriate legal standard in resolving…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- People v. ThomasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- People v. CagleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- People v. BreidenbachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- People v. UnruhSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- People v. MelgosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.