Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Allegheny County Institution District

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1949No. Appeal, 181PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

There are two reasons why plaintiff is not entitled to the specific performance which he is here seeking of a contract for the purchase of land. One is that the contract did not receive the approval of the court required by statute, the other that the action is barred by the statute of limitations.

By the Act of April 23,1852, P. L. 423, a corporation Avas created under the title of “The directors of the poor and of the house of employment for the county of Allegheny,” — a name that was changed by the supplementary Act of May 4, 1864, P. L. 760, to “Allegheny…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Joseph Melnick Building & Loan Ass'n v. MelnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Jones v. Commonwealth Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Le Bar, to Use v. PattersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Neville v. ScottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Yoder v. T. F. Scholes, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. International Election Systems Corp. v. ShoupDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Swift v. AllanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  5. DeAngelis v. NewmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API