Legal Opinion
Joren v. Napolitano
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 7, 2011No. 10-1017PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Per curiam
Verlaine Joren sued the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), alleging that she was forced to quit her job as a security screener at Midway Airport after her supervisor discriminated against her based on her disability, age, and gender and retaliated against her for settling a previous complaint about the discrimination. The district court granted the TSA’s motion to dismiss, concluding that Joren failed to state a claim for relief under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17, and that as a former employee of the TSA, she was ineligible to seek redress under the Rehabilitation Act,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tamayo v. BlagojevichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge GroupSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Conyers v. RossidesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. All Funds on Deposit With R.J. O'Brien & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Field v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Kaswatuka v. DHSCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- Connors v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Anna Galaza v. Alejandro MayorkasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.