Legal Opinion

Connors v. United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 13, 2017No. Docket 16-1680-cvPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

In Conyers v. Rossides, 558 F.3d 137, 148 (2d Cir. 2009), cert. denied, 568 U.S. 933, 133 S.Ct. 329, 184 L.Ed.2d 241 (2012), we held that Section 111(d) of the Aviation Transportation Security Act, 49 U.S.C. § 44935 note (“ATSA”), precluded judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 701(a) (“APA”), of a decision by the Transportation Security Administration (“TSA”) not to utilize the Federal Aviation Administration’s personnel management system in deciding whom to employ or appoint as a screening officer. We did not hold as a general matter that APA review was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Conyers v. RossidesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  2. Joren v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  3. Field v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  4. Conyers v. PistoleSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Abdul-Matiyn v. The Department of the NavyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
  2. Campbell v. WolfDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2021
  3. Cillie v. EsperDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
  4. Clements v. Comprehensive Security Services, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 2021
  5. Hadfield v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API