Legal Opinion
M & C Corp. v. Erwin Behr GmbH & Co., KG
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 26, 1996No. Civil A. No. 91-74110PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
GADOLA, District Judge.
Defendant, Erwin Behr GmbH & Co., KG (“Erwin Behr”), brings this motion for a protective order as to the time and location of the deposition duces tecum noticed by the plaintiff, M & C Corporation (“M & C”), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6). Erwin Behr submits that requiring its witnesses to travel to Detroit specifically for a deposition and requiring it to produce numerous documents from Germany would be unduly burdensome. Erwin Behr requests that this court order all depositions and document…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sugarhill Records Ltd. v. Motown Record Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Reliable Volkswagen Sales & Service Co. v. World-Wide Automobiles Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1960
3Cited by10 opinions
- Custom Form Manufacturing, Inc. v. Omron Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2000
- Schindler Elevator Corp. v. Otis Elevator Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- M & C Corp. v. Erwin Behr GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- M & C CORP. v. Erwin Behr GmbH & Co., KGDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
- Azarax, Inc. v. Wireless Communications Venture LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.