Legal Opinion

M & C CORP. v. Erwin Behr GmbH & Co., KG

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided January 25, 1999No. CIV.A. 91-74110PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (1) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF PARTIAL SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT; (2) DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY SANCTIONS; (3) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISSOLVE RECEIVERSHIP; AND (4) DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION BY BEHR INDUSTRIES, INC. TO INTERVENE

GADOLA, District Judge.

On May 12,1998, the Sixth Circuit issued a decision remanding this case to this court. In the wake of that decision, the parties filed a number of motions, including:

1. a motion by defendant, Erwin Behr GmbH & Company, KG (“Erwin Behr”), for entry of partial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. M & C Corporation, a Michigan Corporation, D/B/A Connelly Company v. Erwin Behr Gmbh & Co., Kg, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. M & C Corp. v. Erwin Behr GmbH & Co., KGDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996
  3. M & C Corporation v. Erwin Behr Gmbh & Co., KgCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. M & C Corporation, a Michigan Corporation, D/B/A Connelly Company v. Erwin Behr Gmbh & Company, Kg, a Foreign Corporation, Heinz EtzelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. M & C Corp. v. Erwin Behr GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. M & C Corporation v. Erwin Behr Gmbh & Co., KgCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API