State v. Boyd
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtPruyn, J.
The defendant was convicted, after a trial to the court, of the crime of nonsupport, and on this appeal from the judgment he has assigned as error the conclusion of the trial court upon all the evidence that he was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. General Statutes § 53-304.
On examining the entire evidence, which we must do in considering this assignment of error in order to determine whether the court erred in its conclusion of guilt, having regard to its finding only to ascertain its decision on conflicting evidence; State v. Pundy, 147 Conn. 7, 8; the court could reasonably find the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. PundySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- State v. MoranSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- State v. SchweitzerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
- People Ex Rel. Gottschalk v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- State v. JordanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Monmouth County Division of Social Services ex rel. Division of Youth & Family Services v. C.R.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Epp v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1991
- Monmouth County v. G.D.M.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- In Re L.Connecticut Superior Court · 1993
- In Re Dalene C., (Feb. 16, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.