Brent A. Willoughby. Order Reversed en banc CHIEF JUSTICE BOATRIGHT delivered the Opinion of the Court, in which JUSTICE HOOD

against self-incrimination. The trial court agreed with the defendant that he was in custody when he made the incriminating statements. The supreme court now holds that the defendant was not in custody for Miranda purposes. Applying the factors from People v. Matheny, 46 P.3d 453, 465–66 (Colo. 2002), the court concludes that, under the totality of the circumstances, a reasonable person in the defendant’s position would not believe their freedom of movement was restricted to the degree associated with a formal arrest. Thus, the court reverses and remands. 2 The Supreme Court of the State of…