Legal Opinion
KING FURNITURE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. v. Thompson
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 9, 1968No. [No. 88, September Term, 1967.]PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHorney, J.
The employer and insurer, claiming that the title to Chapter 322 of the Laws of 1965 (adding § 36(3a) to § 36(3) of Article 101 concerning the payment of compensation to a claimant “having a serious disability”) did not properly describe what is in the body of the act, contends that the addition is unconstitutional.
The claimant (Albert Thompson) sustained an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment and as a result suffered a hundred per cent loss of use of the right eye. At the time of the accident his average weekly wage was $80. Subsection (b) of § 36(3)…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Allied American Mutual Fire Insurance v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Neuenschwander v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Solvuca v. Ryan & Reilly Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
- Mahoney v. ByersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Leonardo v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Edgewood Nursing Home v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Board of County Commissioners v. ColganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Barnes v. Ezrine Tire Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Colgan v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Stapleford Hall Joint Venture v. HyattCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.