Legal Opinion

Stapleford Hall Joint Venture v. Hyatt

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 13, 1993No. 126, September Term, 1992PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KARWACKI, Judge.

This appeal provides us with the opportunity to apply Maryland Code (1957, 1985 Repl.Vol. and 1990 Cum.Supp.), Art. 101, § 36(3)(a)(iii) 1 to the case of a claimant who, upon reopening his claim under § 40(b) of the Workers’ Compensation article, was awarded additional compensation as a result of a worsening of his condition. With that additional award, the claimant qualified for additional compensation under the “serious disability” provision of § 36(3)(a)(iii). At issue is whether the Commission properly applied the subsection’s credit proviso in a case where the initially…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Taxiera v. MalkusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. Barnes v. Ezrine Tire Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  4. KING FURNITURE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  5. Consolidated Engineering Co. v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Montgomery County v. BuckmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. State Department of Assessments & Taxation v. the Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Philip Electronics North America v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Fikar v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Blitz v. Beth Isaac Adas Israel CongregationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API