Legal Opinion

State v. Priest

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 18, 2000No. 18259-2-IIIPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

— David R. Priest, convicted of taking a motor vehicle without owner’s permission (TMVWOP), raises two issues in his appeal. First, whether the trial court erred by refusing to instruct on intoxication. Second, whether the sentencing court’s conceded oversight or omission in failing to strike a sex offender registration paragraph should first be decided in this appeal rather than in the trial court in a CrR 7.8 motion. We answer “no” to both questions. Accordingly, we affirm with leave to the trial court to first consider correcting the uncontested clerical error under RAP 7.2(e).

FACTS

In…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. CoatesWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Presidential Estates Apartment Associates v. BarrettWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. McGrathCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  5. State v. GabryschakCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. George Abraham DillonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  2. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  3. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. State v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API